There is a deceptively simple question underneath Parshat Vayeshev: Who belongs, and who gets to decide?
Vayeshev opens with a quiet but powerful line: “Vayeshev Yaakov b’eretz megurei aviv, b’eretz Canaan.” “Jacob settled in the land where his father had sojourned, in the land of Canaan.” The Torah does not rush past this. It names the land twice. Jacob is not just living somewhere; he is living where he comes from. And almost immediately, that sense of rootedness is challenged.
Joseph, Yaakov’s beloved son, dreams. He sees himself standing tall, recognized, destined. And the response from his brothers is swift and brutal. They strip him of his coat, throw him into a pit, and sell him away. Long before Joseph is physically exiled, he is symbolically erased; his belonging questioned, his place among them denied.
This pattern should feel uncomfortably familiar.
Joseph is not attacked for what he has done, but for what he represents. His dreams threaten the story the brothers want to tell about themselves. So they rewrite it. They recast Joseph not as kin, but as an outsider. Once he is no longer “one of us,” violence becomes possible and permissible. The Torah is warning us that the most dangerous act is not disagreement, but erasure.
This is the same dynamic we see today when the question “Where do Jews come from?” is distorted or avoided. The answer is not complicated. We come from the Land of Israel. Historically, spiritually, linguistically, and ritually, our story is rooted there. Zion is not an idea layered onto Jewish identity; it is its foundation.
Zionism, at its core, is simply the affirmation that the Jewish people have the right to live freely and safely in the land from which we come. And yet that affirmation is increasingly framed as immoral, colonial, or illegitimate, often through the language of human rights. But human rights language, when used to deny one people their indigeneity and their right to self-determination, stops being moral and starts being a weapon.
Like Joseph’s brothers, anti-Zionism often begins by stripping Jews of context: history, roots, and belonging. It recasts an indigenous people as interlopers, a native story as a conspiracy, a homecoming as a crime. And once belonging is denied, anything can be justified.
Let’s be clear, as our tradition demands honesty, criticizing Israeli policies is legitimate and necessary. Advocating for Palestinian dignity is essential. But denying Jewish peoplehood, history, and origin is something else entirely.
Joseph survives because the Torah refuses to erase him, even when his brothers try. His story continues. His dreams endure. And ultimately, it is Joseph’s rootedness, his unwavering sense of who he is, that saves his family.
Vayeshev challenges us to resist narratives that shrink identity and flatten history. It asks us to hold firm to truth, even when it is uncomfortable or unpopular. We know where we come from. And knowing that is not about supremacy; it is about survival. Shabbat shalom.